Lecturers will put into practice the educational activities they deem appropriate in order to facilitate the study and learning of the student.

 The development of the teaching of the subject and of the learning of the student is based on the following formative activities:

 1. Guided activities: activities where the teacher develops the active part of the class.

It includes master classes where the student reaches the conceptual bases of the subject and its legal and regulatory framework and jurisprudential.

Also, the practical classes, where students, individually or in small groups, analyze and solve along with the professor practical cases.

 2. Supervised activities: activities that students will develop individually or in small groups, with the support of the lecturer, in order to prepare the evaluable practices,

such as discussion and resolution of cases, comments, debates, simulations of judgments, others.

 3. Autonomous activities: activities that students will develop autonomously. It includes among others the search and reading of bibliography,

norms and jurisprudence, study, preparation of practical cases.

 The proposed teaching methodology may undergo some modifications according to the restrictions imposed by the health authorities on on-campus courses.

Transparency in the use of AI: For this subject, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed exclusively in support tasks such as information search, text correction, translations or information organization. The student must clearly identify the use he has made of AI, share with the teaching staff the interactions maintained with AI tools and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in serious cases.

The proposed evaluation activities may undergo some changes according to the restrictions imposed by the health authorities on on-campus courses.

For every single group, the dates of the evaluation activities will be announced at the beginning of the course in the Virtual Campus, even though, exceptionally and force majeure, these activities could, with advance notice in good time, be modified.

Qualification of the assignments and participation in class will be published before the final exam.

To pass the subject, student must have taken part in the three evaluation activities and to get a minimum mark of 3,5 at the final exam.

To be eligible to participate in the retake process, it is required to: 1) Do the final exam and do not pass it, and 2) have achieved an average grade in every one of the three evaluation activities not inferior to 3. Students who take the retake exam will be a maximum grade of the subject is 7.

The students will be evaluated if they have completed a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to a minimum of 2/3 parts of the total qualification of the subject. If the value of the activities carried out does not reach this threshold, the teacher of the subject can consider the student as not evaluable.

In the case of a single assessment, on the official day the students will have to deliver 5 practices with a value of 10% each, previously published, and take an exam lasting two hours and with a value of 50%. The conditions for access to the revaluation are to have obtained a minimum grade of 3.5 in the exam and a 3 in each of the practices. In case of reassessment, the exam will also be held on the official date and will also last for two hours. The assessment and reassessment exam is different from the continuous assessment to ensure that the students have achieved the subject's skills. Students who retake the exam may obtain a maximum grade of 7.

Irregularities in evaluation activities: In spite of other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, \"in the case that the student makes any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of evaluation activity, it will be graded with a 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that can be instructed. In case of various irregularities occur in the evaluation of the same subject, the final grade of this subject will be 0\". Section 10 of Article 116. Results of the evaluation. (UAB Academic Regulations).