
Environmental Technology
Code: 106930 ECTS Credits: 6| Degree | Type | Year |
|---|---|---|
| Management of Smart and Sustainable Cities | FB | 1 |
Contact
- Name:
- Xavier Font Segura
- Email:
- xavier.font@uab.cat
Teachers
- Oscar Mauricio Martinez Avila
Teaching groups languages
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Prerequisites
Having completed the subject of Matter Fluxes and the Water Cycle.
Objectives and Contextualisation
The objectives of this subject are:
- To learn how to formulate non-steady-state material balances and energy balances in any system.
- To delve into the waste cycle in cities and its processes of valorization, treatment, and final disposal.
Learning Outcomes
- CM03 (Competence) Relate the knowledge and skills of the subject with those provided by other technicians in interdisciplinary teams.
- KM06 (Knowledge) Describe energy storage, generation and distribution systems, as well as the technologies, tools and techniques of environmental engineering.
- SM04 (Skill) Analyse the characteristics of the different technological and infrastructural components of the different systems in urban environments.
Content
Activities and Methodology
| Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type: Directed | |||
| Problem lessons | 22 | 0.88 | CM03, KM06, SM04, CM03 |
| Theory classes | 24 | 0.96 | CM03, KM06, SM04, CM03 |
| Visitas externas | 4 | 0.16 | SM04, SM04 |
| Type: Autonomous | |||
| Study | 47 | 1.88 | |
| Work-assignments | 46 | 1.84 |
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Assessment
Continous Assessment Activities
| Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exams | 60 | 4 | 0.16 | KM06, SM04 |
| Work assignments and class activities | 40 | 3 | 0.12 | CM03, KM06, SM04 |
Process and Scheduled Evaluation Activities
The course consists of the following evaluation activities:
Exams: Two partial exams will be conducted during the course. Each exam will account for 30% of the final grade. Exams will consist of questions related to the material covered in both theory and problem-solving classes and the external visit. The second partial exam may include concepts assessed in the first partial.
Project/Case Study: 25% of the grade. This portion of the grade is not recoverable.
In-Class Evaluative Activities: 15%. This portion of the grade is not recoverable.
The minimum grades required to pass the course are:
- First partial exam: 3.5
- Second partial exam: 5
- Case study: 5
- Overall grade: 5
Schedule of Evaluation Activities
Exams will be held according to the schedule set in the Degree's exam calendar.
Recovery Process
The recovery process is exclusively for students who have not passed the course through continuous assessment.
- Partial exams are eliminatory if the grade is equal to or higher than 5.
- The final grade calculation in the recovery process will be conducted in the same manner as continuous assessment and with the same minimum grade criteria.
- Group work and in-class evaluative activities are not recoverable.
Procedure for Reviewing Grades
For each evaluation activity with an individual weight of more than 25%, a location, date, and time for review will be specified where the activity can be reviewed in person. In this context, claims regarding the grade of the activity may be made, which will be evaluated by the responsible faculty member. If the student does not attend this review, the activity will not be reviewed subsequently. For other activities, the student will have a period of 48 hours from the moment the grade is published to request a review.
Grading
Awarding honors (MH) is at the discretion of the course's responsible faculty member. UAB regulations stipulate that MH can only be awarded to individuals who have obtained a final grade of 9.00 or higher. Up to 5% of MH can be awarded from the total enrolled. In this course, to be eligible for honors, in addition to the aforementioned criteria, a grade of 8.5 or higher is required in each evaluative activity and no exams should have been retaken.
If a grade lower than 5 is obtained in the Case Study, as it is not recoverable, the final course grade will be Fail. The final grade obtained will correspond to the lower grade between the project and the average of the exams.
If, after the recovery process, a final grade equal to or higher than 5 is obtained, but with a grade lower than the minimum required in any of the exams, it will be assessed as Fail. The final grade obtained will correspond to the exam with the lowest grade obtained in recovery.
A person who does not pass the course through continuous assessment and does not attend the partial exams recovery will be considered Not Evaluable.
Artificial Intelligence tools
The use of Artificial Intelligence tools is not allowed in this course for any of the assessment activities. If their use is permitted in any of them, it will be indicated accordingly.
Irregularities: Copying and Plagiarism
Copying in any evaluation activity will result in failing the course with a grade of 3 out of 10, with no opportunity to retake any recovery exams.
Evaluation of Repeating Students
There is no different evaluation system for repeating students. There is the possibility of retaining the grade from the previous year's project and in-class evaluative activities, provided that the repetition is not due to copying.
Unique Evaluation
The content will correspond to both theory and problem-solving sessions. The unique evaluation format will consist of the following tests:
- Exams corresponding to the first and second partial exams ofthe course, of the same characteristics as those taken by the rest of the students (60% of the final grade).
- An oral session, where the student must present a previously indicated topic followed by a question session about the presented work and general topics of the course (40% of the final grade). This part is not recoverable
The day of the unique evaluation will coincide with the day assigned to the second partial exam of the course and, if necessary, will be held on the day assigned for the course recovery following the same procedure as for continuous evaluation.
The minimum grade criteria to be applied will be:
- Minimum grade of 3.5 in the synthesis exam.
- Minimum grade of 5 in the oral session.
Second and subsequent enrollments
If the student requests it, the grades for activities, group work, and midterms with a score above 5 will be maintained.
Bibliography
- George Tchobanoglous, Hilary Theisen, Samuel A. Vigil. Gestión integral de residuos sólidos. Editorial Mc Graw-Hill. 1994.
- Agència de Residus de Catalunya, www.arc.cat
- R. T. Haug. The Practical Handbook of Compost Engineering. Editorial CRC Press. 1993. (Disponible document electrònic: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uab/detail.action?docID=5389526)
- Agència Europea del Medi Ambient, https://www.eea.europa.eu
- Gilbert M. Masters Wendell P. Ela Pearson Introducción a la ingeniería medioambiental Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-84-8322-444-1. 2008
- Himmelblau D. (1989) “Basic principles and calculations in Chemical Engineering”. Prentice-Hall
- Aucejo, A. i col. (1999) "Introducció a l'Enginyeria Química" Pòrtic. Biblioteca Universitària. Ed. Enciclopèdia Catalana.
Software
N/A
Groups and Languages
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
| Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (PAUL) Classroom practices | 611 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
| (PAUL) Classroom practices | 612 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
| (TE) Theory | 61 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |