
Sectorial Risk Models
Code: 104008 ECTS Credits: 6| Degree | Type | Year |
|---|---|---|
| Prevention and Integral Safety and Security | OB | 2 |
Contact
- Name:
- Jordi Rodriguez Lumbiarres
- Email:
- jordi.rodriguez.lumbiarres@uab.cat
Teaching groups languages
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Prerequisites
This subject does not have any prerequierments
Objectives and Contextualisation
Competences
- Act with ethical responsibility and respect for fundamental rights and duties, diversity and democratic values.
- Carry out analyses of preventative measures in the area of security.
- Identify the resources necessary to respond to management needs for prevention and integral security.
- Know how to communicate and transmit ideas and result efficiently in a professional and non-expert environment, both orally and in writing.
- Make efficient use of ITC in the communication and transmission of results.
- Plan and coordinate the resources of the three large subsystems that interact in questions of security: people, technology and infrastructures.
- Respond to problems applying knowledge to practice.
- Students must be capable of applying their knowledge to their work or vocation in a professional way and they should have building arguments and problem resolution skills within their area of study.
- Students must be capable of collecting and interpreting relevant data (usually within their area of study) in order to make statements that reflect social, scientific or ethical relevant issues.
- Students must be capable of communicating information, ideas, problems and solutions to both specialised and non-specialised audiences.
- Students must develop the necessary learning skills to undertake further training with a high degree of autonomy.
- Students must have and understand knowledge of an area of study built on the basis of general secondary education, and while it relies on some advanced textbooks it also includes some aspects coming from the forefront of its field of study.
- Take sex- or gender-based inequalities into consideration when operating within one's own area of knowledge.
- Use the capacity for analysis and synthesis to solve problems.
- Work and learn autonomously.
- Work in institutional and interprofessional networks.
Learning Outcomes
- Analyse the preventative interventions in matters of security, environment, quality and social corporate responsibility and identify the inherent risk factors.
- Analyse the sex- or gender-based inequalities and the gender biases present in one's own area of knowledge.
- Coordinate the resources of the three main subsystems of the prevention and integral security sector: people, technology and infrastructures.
- Critically analyse the principles, values and procedures that govern professional practice.
- Identify, develop or acquire and maintain the main resources necessary to respond to tactical and operational needs inherent in the prevention and security sector.
- Know how to communicate and transmit ideas and result efficiently in a professional and non-expert environment, both orally and in writing.
- Make efficient use of ITC in the communication and transmission of results.
- Respond to problems applying knowledge to practice.
- Students must be capable of applying their knowledge to their work or vocation in a professional way and they should have building arguments and problem resolution skills within their area of study.
- Students must be capable of collecting and interpreting relevant data (usually within their area of study) in order to make statements that reflect social, scientific or ethical relevant issues.
- Students must be capable of communicating information, ideas, problems and solutions to both specialised and non-specialised audiences.
- Students must develop the necessary learning skills to undertake further training with a high degree of autonomy.
- Students must have and understand knowledge of an area of study built on the basis of general secondary education, and while it relies on some advanced textbooks it also includes some aspects coming from the forefront of its field of study.
- Take a preventative view in the area of security.
- Use the capacity for analysis and synthesis to solve problems.
- Work and learn autonomously.
- Work in institutional and interprofessional networks.
Content
Activities and Methodology
| Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type: Directed | |||
| Classes with TIC support and Evaluation | 16 | 0.64 | 4, 2, 14, 6, 3, 8, 1, 7, 5, 13, 12, 11, 9, 10, 17, 16, 15 |
| Type: Supervised | |||
| Tutorials to support practical and theoretical work (Webex sessions and forums). Resolution of doubts. Follow-up of the exercises; Attention in the Moodle Classroom | 24 | 0.96 | 2, 6, 8, 7, 17, 16, 15 |
| Type: Autonomous | |||
| Resolution of practical cases. Realization of works. Personal study | 110 | 4.4 | 4, 2, 14, 6, 3, 8, 1, 7, 5, 13, 12, 11, 9, 10, 17, 16, 15 |
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Assessment
Continous Assessment Activities
| Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presential written test of Continuous Evaluation | 50% | 0 | 0 | 6, 8, 7, 13, 12, 11, 9, 10, 17, 16, 15 |
| Specific work, preferably in a group, that develops a specific aspect of the contents of the units. | 20% | 0 | 0 | 4, 2, 14, 6, 3, 8, 1, 7, 5, 13, 12, 11, 9, 10, 17, 16, 15 |
| Theoretical Continuous Evaluation Tests-individual practices | 30% | 0 | 0 | 4, 2, 14, 6, 3, 8, 1, 7, 5, 13, 12, 11, 9, 10, 17, 16, 15 |
Use of IA
In this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed as an integral part of the development of the work, provided that the result reflects a significant contribution of the student in the analysis and personal reflection. The studentmust clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a penalty in the grade of the activity, greater sanctions in cases of seriousness.
Bibliography
ALONSO GARCÍA, Ángel. (1988) Conceptos de organización industrial. 1ª Edición. Marcombo. Barcelona
CALATAYUD SARTHOU, A. et al. Evaluación y control de los riesgos laborales. (2006) Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia
CARRILLO DONAIRE, Juan A. (2000) Derecho de la Calidad y de la Seguridad Industrial. Marcial Pons
CORTÉS, J. M. (2000) Técnicas de prevención de riesgos laborales. Ed. Tébar Flores, Madrid
COBO SÁNCHEZ, D. (2004) Introducción a la prevención de riesgos laborales. ISTAS, Madrid.
DURÁN, F. (2001). Informe sobre riesgos laborales y su prevención. La seguridad y salud en el trabajo en España. Estudio para la elaboración de un informe sobre riesgos laborales y su prevención. Presidencia de Gobierno, Madrid
FERNANDEZ MARCOS, L. (2000) El ámbito natural de la evaluación de riesgos en la normativa preventiva. Aranzadi Social, pág. 631-646
GARCÍA NINET,J.L. (Dir.). (2005) Manual de prevención de riesgos laborales (Seguridad, Higiene y salud en el trabajo), Atelier, Barcelona
MELIÁ NAVARRO, José Luis.(2007) El factor humano en la seguridad laboral. Lettera, Bilbao
MÉTAYER, Y; HIRSCH, L. (2007). Primeros pasos en la gestión de riesgos. AENOR, Madrid
MOLES PLAZA, Ramón Jordi. Derecho y calidad. El régimen jurídico de la normalización técnica. (2001) Ariel Derecho
MUÑOZ RUIZ; Ana Belén. (2009) El sistema normativo de prevención de riesgos laborales, Lex Nova, Valladolid
OIT. Proyecto de directrices técnicas de la OIT sobre sistemas de gestión de la seguridad y salud en el trabajo, Ginebra, 2001
OIT. Trabajo sin riesgo y cultura de la seguridad. Informe de la OIT presentado con ocasión del Día Mundial sobre la Seguridad y la Salud en el Trabajo 2004
OIT. La prevención: una estrategia global. Informe de la OIT para el Día mundial sobre la seguridad y la salud en el trabajo 2005. Ginebra, 2005
RUBIO ROMERO, J.C. (2004) Métodos de evaluación de riesgos laborales. Diaz de Santos, Madrid, 2004
SALA FRANCO, Tomás. Derecho de la prevención de riesgos laborales. 3ªEd. Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2007
TARRÉS VIVES, Marc. Normas técnicas y ordenamiento jurídico. Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2003
Software
This subject will use the basic software of the Office 365 package
Groups and Languages
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
| Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (TE) Theory | 1 | Spanish | second semester | afternoon |