
Criminal Law III
Code: 102245 ECTS Credits: 6| Degree | Type | Year |
|---|---|---|
| 2500786 Law | OB | 2 |
Contact
- Name:
- Rafael Rebollo Vargas
- Email:
- rafael.rebollo@uab.cat
Teachers
- Margarita Bonet Esteva
- Maria Jose Rodriguez Puerta
- Josep Riba Ciurana
- Victor Muñoz Casalta
- Maria Jose Pifarre De Moner
- Jose Lopez Sanchez
Teaching groups languages
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Prerequisites
The teaching of the subject will be taught taking into account the perspective of the sustainable development objectives.
For an understanding and a correct follow-up of this subject it is advisable to have passed the two previous subjects (Criminal Law I and Criminal Law II). With respect to other subjects under study in the first year, it is also especially a good knowledge of the basic institutions object of the Constitutional Law programs.
Group 01: Rafael Rebollo Vargas
Seminari 1: Rafael Rebollo Vargas (Spanish/Catalan)
Seminari 2: María José Pifarrer De Moner (Spanish/Catalan)
Seminari 3: Pep López Sánchez (Spanish/Catalan)
Group 02: María José Rodríguez Puerta
Seminari 1: María José Rodriguez Puerta (Spanish)
Seminari 2: Víctor Muñoz Casalta (Spanish/Catalan)
Seminari 3: Margarita Bonet Esteva (Catalan)
Group 51: Margarita Bonet Esteve
Seminari 1: Margarita Bonet Esteve (Catalan)
Seminari 2: Josep Riba Ciurana (Spanish/Catalan)
Seminari 3: Lidia Pérez Casasayas (Spanish/Catalan)
Group Dret + ADE: Margarita Bonet Esteva
Seminari 1: Magarita Bonet Esteva (Catalan)
Seminari 2: María José Rodríguez Puerta (Spanish)
Objectives and Contextualisation
Competences
- Acquiring the basic knowledge from the several legal dogmas and presenting them in public.
- Arguing and laying the foundation for the implementation of legal standards.
- Demonstrating a sensible and critical reasoning: analysis, synthesis, conclusions.
- Drawing up legal texts (contracts, judgements, sentences, writs, rulings, wills, legislation...).
- Explaining the legislative reforms and jurisprudential changes.
- Identifying and solving problems.
- Identifying the underlying conflicts of interest in disputes and real cases.
- Identifying, assessing and putting into practice changes in jurisprudence.
- Identifying, knowing and applying the basic and general principles of the legal system.
- Managing bibliographic and documentary resources: databases, browsing, etc.
- Mastering the computing techniques when it comes to obtaining legal information (legislation databases, jurisprudence, bibliography...) and in data communication.
- Memorising and utilising legal terminology.
- Planning and organising: managing of time, resources, etc.
- Presenting in front of an audience the problems of a concrete law suit, the applicable legal regulations, and the most consistent solutions.
- Searching, interpreting and applying legal standards, arguing every case.
- Students must be capable of demonstrating a critical awareness of the analysis of the legal system and development of legal dialectics.
- Students must be capable of demonstrating the unitary nature of the legal system and of the necessary interdisciplinary view of legal problems.
- Students must be capable of learning autonomously and having an entrepreneurial spirit.
- Students must be capable of making decisions.
- Students must be capable of perceiving the impact and implications of the decisions taken.
- Students must prove they know and comprehend the main public and private institutions in its genesis and as a whole.
- Use different information and communication technologies.
- Using the main constitutional principles and values as a working tool in the interpretation of the legal system.
- Working in teams, being either a member or a coordinator of working groups, as well as making decisions affecting the whole group.
Learning Outcomes
- Acquiring the basic knowledge of criminal law.
- Arguing the implementation of criminal laws in the resolution of criminal problems.
- Becoming aware of the importance of the ethical commitment of the lawyer in the criminal proceeding.
- Defining defence strategies of the criminal legal interests.
- Defining the link between the criminal law and the constitutional principles and values.
- Defining the main criminal institutions.
- Demonstrating a sensible and critical reasoning: analysis, synthesis, conclusions.
- Distinguishing the dependence and autonomy relations between criminal law and the rest of branches of the legal system (civil, labour, administration, finances).
- Distinguishing the important connexion between the substantive criminal law and the procedural criminal law.
- Drawing up documents of specific criminal content linked to the process, fundamentally of provisional conclusions, appeals, and sentences.
- Drawing up resolutions of criminal cases.
- Finding the applicable legislation between the criminal code and special criminal laws.
- Identifying and assessing the jurisprudence of Provincial Courts and the Supreme Court in criminal matters.
- Identifying and knowing the limiting principles of labour law.
- Identifying and solving problems.
- Identifying the conflicts of interest underlying in a concrete criminal law suit.
- Identifying the conflicts of interest underlying in a general criminal law suit.
- Identifying, knowing and applying the interpretative principles of criminal law.
- Interpreting the criminal laws as criminal policy decisions.
- Introducing in the classroom the defence or accusation of criminal cases.
- Laying the foundation for the implementation of criminal laws in the resolution of criminal problems.
- Managing bibliographic and documentary resources: databases, browsing, etc.
- Memorising and using the criminal specific terminology.
- Planning and organising: managing of time, resources, etc.
- Presenting in an oral or written way the legislative reforms and the jurisprudential changes that are carried out in criminal matters.
- Searching criminal sentences in databases.
- Solving interpretation and application problems of criminal laws.
- Students must be capable of learning autonomously and having an entrepreneurial spirit.
- Students must be capable of making decisions.
- Students must be capable of perceiving the impact and implications of the decisions taken.
- Use different information and communication technologies.
- Using the arguments of criminal and constitutional jurisprudence for the resolution of criminal problems.
- Using the main constitutional principles and values as a working tool in the interpretation of the legal system.
- Verbally explaining the resolution of problems related to criminal laws.
- Working in teams, being either a member or a coordinator of working groups, as well as making decisions affecting the whole group.
Content
Activities and Methodology
| Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type: Directed | |||
| Seminars | 22 | 0.88 | 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 8, 34, 21, 16, 17, 14, 18, 24, 3, 15, 27, 30, 29, 35, 12, 31, 33 |
| Theoretical classes. | 22 | 0.88 | 2, 5, 6, 9, 8, 14, 13, 18, 19, 27, 33 |
| Type: Supervised | |||
| Tutorials | 0 | 0 | |
| Type: Autonomous | |||
| Elaboration of the various activities of the seminars | 35 | 1.4 | 1, 2, 26, 4, 5, 7, 9, 8, 34, 21, 22, 16, 17, 14, 13, 18, 24, 3, 20, 15, 10, 11, 27, 28, 30, 29, 35, 12, 31, 32, 33 |
| Realization of schemes, conceptual maps and summaries. | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 6, 23, 24, 29, 12 |
| Study | 56 | 2.24 | 1, 5, 6, 8, 25, 13, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 12 |
Methodology
The work that must be carried out for the adequate learning of the contents discussed in this document requires the completion of two types of activities.
1.- Directed activities. These activities are carried out in the classroom and consist:
Master classes taught by the teaching staff in which the theoretical contents of the subject will be presented (50% of the time).
Seminars: Once the fundamental contents of each of the subjects of the subject have been presented, they will be worked on in the seminars/workshops. The activity carried out in these will be eminently practical and will consist of reading texts, court resolutions and carrying out mock trials and presentations on complementary topics, which will be done in groups to prepare for the evaluation tests (50% of the time). .
2.- Autonomous activities. These activities complement the previous ones and aim for students to work individually and in groups on the contents of the subject. These activities are of two types:
Group work on the materials that will be analyzed in the workshops/seminars on a weekly basis. Several group projects will be carried out and presented in the seminars.
Individual work on the topics and readings of the seminars. Students must study the subject and carry out individual work that will be delivered in writing through Moodle.
Note: 15 minutes of a class will be reserved within the calendar established by the center or by the degree for students to fill out surveys to evaluate the teaching staff's performance and evaluate the subject or module.
The methodology to be used in this subject in the double degree in Law +ADE may vary. The professor in charge will specify when and how the practical activities will be carried out.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Assessment
Continous Assessment Activities
| Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual work (solution of cases with jurisprudence, comments on sentences or doctrinal articles) | 50% | 3 | 0.12 | 1, 5, 6, 25, 14, 18, 23 |
| Overall final test | 50% | 2 | 0.08 | 2, 26, 4, 5, 7, 9, 8, 34, 21, 22, 16, 17, 13, 19, 24, 3, 20, 15, 10, 11, 27, 28, 30, 29, 35, 12, 31, 32, 33 |
1. Continuous evaluation model
Classes start and finish on time, no entry after the start of the class and no exit before the end will be accepted.
The evaluation activity will be carried out throughout the quarter, requiring regular attendance of the student in classes (80%) and the completion of the activities detailed below.
Continued evaluation (value on final grade: 50%). The continuous assessment activities are of your types:
1. Individual activities will consist of the resolution of 2 groups of cases (value on final score: 50%). The first will have a value of 20% and the second 35%.
2. Group activities of seminars. Each seminar will propose an activity to prepare before the seminar or to deliver after, which may consist in the search for jurisprudence, reading and understanding of judgments and conducting simulated trials. Practical cases to prepare assessment tests will also be conducted and resolved. These activities will serve to evaluate the evolution of the student, they have a formative character).
3. Final set test: type test (value on final grade: 50%)
If someone does not show up for one of the individual assessment activities, it can only be recovered if the absence is justified.
2. Single assessment
The student who opts for the single assessment will have to pass an exam that will consist of 2 activities to be performed in 3 hours on the day of the final test:
A multiple-choice test, the same as the student who performs the continuing assessment (value on the final grade: 50%). 1 h
The resolution of 2 cases (value on final score: 50%). 2 a. m.
Like the rest of the student, the student who opts for the single assessment will have the right to request the attention of the teacher responsible for the subject, throughout the semester, in the schedule established for the tutoring.
The same criterion as in the continuing evaluation will be applied to qualify as “Not evaluable”.
3. Standards for passing the subject and reassessment
To pass the assessment it is necessary to obtain a grade of 5 (both in the continuous and single assessment model).
In order to be able to add the scores of the various activities it is necessary to have obtained, at least, a score of 2/5 in the test. If the test score is less than 2, you will have to reevaluate.
If the test score is equal to or greater than 2 and the sum of the scores does not reach 5, the reassessment will have to be done. For this purpose it will be proposed to carry out a case/cases and/or test.
The student will be evaluable provided that he has carried out a set of activities the weight of which is equal to 2/3 parts of the total qualification of the subject. If the value of the activities does not reach this value, the teacher of the subject may consider it “Invaluable”.
If during an exam the presence of students copying is detected, they will be automatically suspended without the possibility of access to recovery. In case of plagiarism in the writing of works, each case will be evaluated and, in the extreme case, the option of direct suspense without the option of recovery will be considered.
Bibliography
Mandatory readings
- Muñoz Conde, F.rancisco (2023). Derecho penal. Parte especial. 25 ed. València: Tirant lo Blanch.Accés restringit als usuaris de la UAB http://biblioteca.tirant.com/cloudLibrary/login/login?username=UAB&password=8zM8jgWE&redirectto=/ebook/show/9788413362014
- Quintero Olivares, Gonzalo (dir.) (2024). Comentarios a la parte especial del derecho penal. 11ª ed., Pamplona: Thompson.
- Silva Sánchez, Jesús María (dir.) (2023). Lecciones de Derecho Penal. Parte especial. 9ª ed. Barcelona. Atelier
- To prepare the seminars, specific and complementary bibliography will be provided via Moodle.
Each professor responsible for the subject may recommend complementary bibliography through the Moodle.
Software
Westlaw and other case law databases.
Language list
| Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (TE) Theory | 1 | Catalan/Spanish | first semester | morning-mixed |
| (TE) Theory | 2 | Catalan/Spanish | first semester | morning-mixed |
| (TE) Theory | 51 | Catalan/Spanish | first semester | afternoon |
| (TE) Theory | 70 | Catalan/Spanish | first semester | morning-mixed |